July 2012 Essays

July 2012 Essays July 2012 Essay July 2012 Essay Poverty is an universal issue that become a social phenomenal that happen nearly to every countries including in advanced countries. In Malaysia many effort been taken by government to abolish poverty issue since independent day. The results show the poverty rate is reduced by 8. 5 percent in 1999 to 5. 7 percent in 2004. However this poverty rate did not show the exact group of society. It only showed the overall poverty rate in Malaysia.We cannot define the group that usually live in poor living standard. Disable people is happen to be in disability condition that significantly impaired relative to the usual standard of an individual. There are various types of disabilities including physical impairment, sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, intellectual impairment mental illness, and various types of chronic disease. This disability can hamper or reduce a persons ability to carry out their day activities. There are several international research studies have been done to study on the relation of poverty and disability.From the research show that there are positive relationship between poverty and disability which explain that disability is also contribute to the poverty. Even there also research found that disabled people usually live in poor by generation to generation, (Yeo ; Moore,2003 ; Hoogeveen, 2005 ; Elwan, 1999). Although there are several research been done but most of it is studied on other country which only little research been done towards disabled people in this country. Eventually overall poor people and disabled profiling still not been collected by continually and systematic.The proposition is, does mostly disable people is having poor living of standard? What is the basic income of living for disable people? And did poverty actually related with disability? Therefore, this study is an effort to build profiling data for disable people in Selangor area. Indirectly this study is also help to bring awareness about d isable people circumstances which people might only see by one eye and does not bothered PROBLEM STATEMENT This topic was chooses due to several issues concerning that happening related with poverty.Due to ‘’Rancangan Malaysia Ke-10’’ RMK10, the government is concern to civilian and going to increase the society standard of living, however there have been several research studies identify that usually disable society is live in poor which generation by generation. So thus this research true and did the government plan able to help the disable people life. Next, in the announced of Budget 2012, government is doing KAR1SMA project that spending RM1. 4 billion in this programme. Government spending RM332 million for disable people (OKU) but individual disabled people will get from RM150 –RM300.However according to Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Petpositive) president Anthony Thanasayan, â€Å" the budget given was the worse because it is like disabled people hardly got anything and they need at least RM500 monthly to sustain a decent living†. This was written in the association website. From here, this issue can be related with poor living life that disabled people faces. On top of that, according to ‘’Berita Harian’’(3 April 2011) newspaper stated that from the Malaysia Statistic Department, poverty rate in Malaysia are decline from 1970 (49. 3%) to 2009 (3. 8%).However does this also showing that the rate for disabled poor people is also decreasing. Due to the issues, this study will make survey to find the true situation that happen towards the disabled people. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The main objective of this project paper is to do a case study that related with poverty among the disabled people. From here the objectives to achieve for this project paper are: 1. To analyze current situation of people with disability. 2. To identify the quality of life of people with di sability.. 3. To identify the factors that effects the quality of life of people with disability.SCOPE OF STUDY This study will analyze on the disable society which is working and non-working in Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan area at age above 20. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The theoretical framework that we try to investigate is towards several factors that might effects disable people quality of life. The dependent variable is quality of life (income), which is the variable of primary interest. This study is attempt to explain the variance in this dependent variable by the six independent variables of (1) healthcare, (2) education level, (3) personal emotion, (4) social community, and (5) job employment.METHODOLOGY Data for this study will be obtains from primary sources. Data will be collect by questionnaire towards disabled people in Selangor area. The questionnaire is to get the personal information such as age, education level, marital status and income. Other methods of data coll ection will also be applies like observations studies which to identify the rate of poverty according to years and statistic of disabled people. After collect the data, then data will be analyze and testing to get finding which will show the results either null hypothesis is accepted or reject.DEFINATION OF TERMS Impairment: An individual’s condition – physical, sensory, intellectual or behavioural Disability: A complex system of social restrictions imposed on people with impairments resulting in a denial of rights and equal opportunities. Disabled people or people with disabilities: The chosen terminology of the disability movement varies between cultures and languages. In this document is used term of disabled people, as this is favoured in the UK. However in other countries the disability movement prefers people with disabilities.Inclusive Policies: Policies which acknowledge that socially excluded, poor or vulnerable people are not a homogeneous group and that dis abled people have a right to be included in poverty alleviation and development work. Chronic Poverty: For these purposes, chronic poverty is defined as those who are intergenerationally poor and also experience multi-dimensional poverty (income, education, social capital etc. ). Self- Help groups: groups and organisations which come together to address the causes of their oppression, discrimination or poverty and to advocate for inclusion. CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEWCHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2. 1 Introduction . 10 2. 2 International Migration Theories . 13 2. 3 International Migration and Paid Domestic Workers in Malaysia .. 18 2. 4 Conclusion .. 3 According to G. M. Monawar Hosain, David Atkinson, and Peter Underwood (2002) in their study is about Impact of Disability on Quality of Life of Rural Disabled People in Bangladesh. The method of their research is conducted a door-to-door survey in two villages in Bangladesh to collect socioeconomic and demographic information o n the villagers and for identification of disabled people. Information on disability and how it affected their life was also obtained either from the disabled people or from their caregivers by interviewing them.The finding revealed that disability had a devastating effect on the quality of life of the disabled people with a particularly negative effect on their marriage, educational attainment, employment, and emotional state. Disability also jeopardized their personal, family and social life. More than half of the disabled people were looked at negatively by society. Disabled women and girl children suffered more from negative attitudes than their male counterparts, resulting in critical adverse effects on their psychological and social health.The recommendations are a combination of educational, economic and intensive rehabilitative measures should be implemented urgently to make them self-reliant. Collaborative communication between professionals and parents, behavioural counsel ling, formation of a self-help group, and comprehensive support to families will reduce their suffering. According to Charles Lwanga and Ntale in their study of poverty (situation, dynamics, and impact) has received much impetus in the last 10 years in Uganda.Evidence from the country’s Household Surveys and the recently concluded Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) has yielded much needed policy-relevant information. Emerging evidence from the studies confirms an intrinsic and mutually reinforcing link between poverty and disability. This study focuses on the relationship between chronic poverty and disability in the country, and it argues that disabled people are not only among the poorest of the poor in the country, but that they remain poor for very long periods of time, and from generation to generation.The study seeks to: (a) summarise the current state of knowledge about disability and chronic poverty in Uganda; (b) discuss the factors that disabled people in  "perpetual poverty†; (c) describe the efforts that are presently being made to address longduration poverty among disabled persons in the country; and (d) propose policy interventions aimed at greater inclusion of disabled people in the country’s development processes.The study adopts Hulme and Shepherd’s definition, taking chronic poverty to be that poverty where individuals or households are trapped in severe and multi-dimensional poverty for an extended period of time, and where poverty is linked with the intergenerational transmission, so people who are born in poverty, live in poverty and pass that poverty onto their children (Hulme and Shepherd,2001).Evidence from the study confirms that disabled people, as individuals, or the households in which they live, face a kind of poverty condition that carries on for a long period of time beyond five (5) years, during which period, and regardless of different macro and micro interventions, affected households or i ndividuals are unable to sustain themselves or to improve on their livelihoods. A three-stage process was followed in the study.Stage 1 involved a comprehensive review of both published and grey literature on disability and poverty in Uganda. Stage 2 was the actual fieldwork. This was conducted in four randomly-selected districts representing the country’s geographical regions of East (Iganga District), West (Mbarara District) and Central (Mukono District). Stage 3 was a detailed analysis of the findings from the study through a series of internal workshops, discussion and synthesis.Each round of visits to a given site was preceded by a pre-visit to make appointments, agree meeting places, and to sound out potential respondents. More focused meetings were held subsequently, delving further into the situation of disabled people, but taking care at appropriate moments to separate men from women, youth from elderly disabled, and people of different categories of disability. Qual itative research methods were used, mostly drawing on PRA/PLA methodology.The finding show (1) the number of disabled people in both rural and urban areas is considerable, though detailed knowledge of specific proportions of the different disabilities is still lacking, (2) disabled people are facing various forms of exclusion, isolation and neglect and this condemns them to perpetual (chronic) poverty. (3) Different categories of disabled people have different needs and are differently affected by poverty. (4) Existing poverty-focused policies and programmes, in their present form, are nadequate in addressing the needs of disabled people with respect to poverty eradication. Available evidence from Uganda so far confirms that disability has a close relationship with chronic poverty, but that the detailed nature of this relationship needs to be further explored. According to Lauren Graham, Lisa Selipsky, Jacqueline Moodley and Jennifer Maina with Dr William Rowland study on the ways i n which poverty and disability are linked and how each compounds the experience in an urban setting.The research was conducted in eight of the poorest wards in Johannesburg and sought to understand how people who had indicated in a previous household survey that they were either living with a disability or were too ill to work, cope in a situation of poverty. The research sought to assess livelihood opportunities, access to education and health care, social networks and support as well as life satisfaction.A mixed-methods approach (Greene, 2008) was employed. This was used to ensure that statistically significant data pertaining to the conditions under which poor people with a disability live were generated in addition to qualitative in-depth data regarding the day-to-day life experiences of a poor person living with a disability. This allowed for triangulation of data and provided information that is rich and contextual, as well as significant for the sample.The research design was framed from a livelihoods perspective, which is underpinned by an assets-approach to poverty (Sen, 1999). Questions posed were therefore intended to understand coping and resilience mechanisms in terms of livelihoods rather than focusing on deficits and challenges. That said, the ability of disabled and chronically ill respondents is obviously constrained by certain factors, which are also assessed.The method involved re-analysing data that had been collected during the Johannesburg Poverty and Livelihoods Study (JPLS) that was conducted in 2007 by the CSDA (de Wet, Patel, Korth ; Forrester, 2008); conducting a follow up survey with members of households who in the 2007 survey had indicated that they were either disabled or too ill to work; conducting semi-structured interviews with fifteen respondents; and conducting one in-depth interview which resulted in a case study of a particular individual who is disabled.From this study show the finding that demonstrated how disability and poverty are intimately linked. What is clear from the findings of this report is that the situation of poverty, with its outcomes including lack of livelihood opportunities and limited access to education serve to provide disabling contexts in which a person living with a disability or chronic illness is less able to demonstrate his or her ability and reach his or her full potential.As a result, it is imperative that initiatives aimed at dealing with the delivery of basic services to all people, including those living with disabilities and chronic illnesses, remain an utmost priority. CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY SOCIAL COMMUNITY PERSONAL EMOTION QUALITY OF LIFE HEALTH EDUCATION JOB